ABSTRACT
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of preloaded toric intraocular lens (IOLs) implantation in eyes undergoing phacoemulsification. Methods: This prospective study included 51 eyes of 51 patients with visually significant cataracts and corneal astigmatism ranging between 0.75 and 5.50 D. All patients underwent phacoemulsification with SupraPhob toric intraocular lens implantation under topical anesthesia. The main outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), residual refractive cylinder, spherical equivalent, and IOL stability at 3 months follow?up. Results: At 3 months, 49% (25/51) of patients had UDVA equal to or better than 20/25 with 100% of eyes achieving better than 20/40. Mean logMAR UDVA improved from 1.02 ± 0.39, preoperatively to 0.11 ± 0.10 at 3 months follow?up (P < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed?rank test). The mean refractive cylinder improved from ? 1.56 ± 1.25 D preoperatively to ? 0.12 ± 0.31 D at 3 months follow?up (P < 0.001) while the mean spherical equivalent value changed from ? 1.93 ± 3.71D preoperatively to ? 0.16 ± 0.27D (P = 0.0013). The mean root mean square value for higher order aberrations was 0.30 ± 0.18 ?m while the average contrast sensitivity value (Pelli?Robson chart) was 1.56 ± 0.10 log unit, at the final follow?up. The mean IOL rotation at 3 weeks was 1.7 ± 1.61 degrees, which did not change significantly at 3 months (P = 0.988) follow?up. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Conclusion: SupraPhob toric IOL implantation is an effective method for addressing preexisting corneal astigmatism in eyes undergoing phacoemulsification with good rotational stability
ABSTRACT
AIM: To investigate the visual quality of LENTIS Comfort Toric intraocular lens implantation in cataract surgery.METHODS: A retrospective controlled clinical study was conducted on 40 patients(40 eyes)who received phacoemulsification combined with intraocular lens implantation assisted by digital navigation, with LENTIS Comfort Toric(MF15T)implanted in group A(24 eyes)and monofocal Toric intraocular lens implanted in group B(16 eyes). The visual acuity at different distances, the postoperative astigmatism center of mass value, the lens loss rate, the change of defocus curve and the stability of intraocular lens were observed at 3mo after surgery.RESULTS: There were no serious complications in both groups, and there was no significant difference in distance vision between group A and group B at 3mo after surgery(P>0.05); the visual acuity and near vision in group A were significantly better than those in group B(P<0.01); the postoperative lens loss rate in group A was 99%, and it was 45% in group B(P<0.05); the value of astigmatism center of mass in 3mo after surgery was improved compared with that before surgery, and there was no significant difference between groups(P>0.05); the defocus curve of group A peaked at +0.50 and -1.75D at 3mo after surgery, forming plateau and gently declining, while group B showed a steep decline after peaks at +0.25 and -0.25D. One eye(4%)in group A had the axial rotation of intraocular lens greater than 10° at 1d after surgery; In group B, 6 eyes(38%)had axial rotation of intraocular lenses greater than 10°, 2 eyes(33%)rotated clockwise, and 4 eyes(67%)rotated counterclockwise. No intraocular lens displacement occurred in either group.CONCLUSION: Both kinds of intraocular lenses can correct astigmatism, among which LENTIS Comfort Toric intraocular lens can provide personalized choices for people with cataract and astigmatism, solve astigmatism and obtain full visual acuity at the same time, with low incidence of postoperative optical interference, better stability, high visual quality and satisfaction.
ABSTRACT
AIM: To investigate the differences in visual recovery, corneal astigmatism, and rotation stability of Toric intraocular lens(TIOL)implantation in cataract patients with different axial lengths.METHODS: Retrospective analysis. A total of 132 patients(132 eyes)with age-related cataract and corneal astigmatism who underwent phacoemulsification cataract extraction combined with TIOL implantation in our hospital's ophthalmology department from February 2021 to September 2022 were selected. They were divided into two groups based on the axial length: the group with axial length ≤24mm(79 cases, 79 eyes)and the group with axial length >24mm(53 cases, 53 eyes). Compare the best corrected distance visual acuity(BCDVA), corneal astigmatism, and TIOL rotation between the two groups of patients at 3mo after surgery.RESULT: After 3mo of surgery, both groups of patients had improved BCDVA and significantly decreased corneal astigmatism compared to those before surgery(P<0.001). However, there was no difference in BCDVA and corneal astigmatism between the two groups(P>0.05), and there was no significant difference in TIOL rotation between the two groups [(5.24±3.72)° vs.(6.36±4.21)°, P=0.110].CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference in visual recovery, corneal astigmatism, and TIOL rotational stability after TIOL implantation in cataract patients with different axial lengths.
ABSTRACT
AIM: To measure the indexes including postoperative distance, middle, near visual acuity and near stereopsis vision of patients with high myopia cataract and corneal astigmatism by femtosecond laser, which can quantify the diameter of capsulorhexis opening, and to evaluate the availability and necessity of Toric intraocular lenses(IOL)in high myopia.METHODS: Prospective case-control study. Patients with binocular high myopia cataract and corneal astigmatism who undergone femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in our hospital were selected, and they were divided into two groups, with 20 cases(40 eyes)in group A(Toric IOL)and 20 cases(40 eyes)in group B(IQ IOL). Indexes, including preoperative corneal astigmatism and spherical equivalent and best-corrected distance visual acuity, uncorrected middle visual acuity, uncorrected near visual acuity, residual refractive astigmatism, near stereopsis acuity, total high-order aberration and total spherical aberration, were measured postoperatively at 7d, 1 and 3mo.RESULTS: The uncorrected middle and near visual acuity, Titmus near stereopsis acuity and residual astigmatism at 7d, 1 and 3mo after surgery were significantly improved in the Toric IOL group than the non-Toric group(all P&#x003C;0.05). The dependence on glasses was reduced. The postoperative best-corrected distance visual acuity, total high-order aberration and total spherical aberration of the two groups showed no statistically significant differences(all P&#x003E;0.05).CONCLUSIONS: The implantation of Toric IOL in patients with high myopia cataract and corneal astigmatism can effectively correct corneal astigmatism, improve postoperative uncorrected middle and near visual acuity and near stereopsis visual function, reduce postoperative dependence on glasses and enhance binocular stereopsis visual function.
ABSTRACT
Background: One of the most widely performed surgical procedures nowadays is cataract surgery combined with monofocal intraocular lens implantation (IOL). Monofocal IOLs can compensate for the spherical refractive error but not astigmatism. Thus, patients with astigmatism are unable to see well after surgery without spectacles. A new generation of IOLs called toric IOLs, improve uncorrected visual acuity in eyes with high astigmatism due to a specific lens design. This study aimed to present a practical method of toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation based on a refractive power analyzer system and slit-lamp observation.Material & Methods:This prospective study comprised 30 patients who underwent toric IOL implantation with cataract extraction at the Department of Ophthalmology, National Institute of Ophthalmology, Dhaka, Bangladesh. This study was conducted from Jan 2021 to Dec 2021. Approval from the local ethical committee was obtained.Results:The study included 45 eyes of 30 patients. The sex distribution of the study patients where the male was 18(60%) and the female was 12(40%). In the age distribution of the study, 5(16.67%) patients were from the 60-69 range, 10(33.33%) patients were from the 70-79 range, and 15(50.00%) patients were from the 80-89 range. The patients’ demographic variables consequently. Changes in visual acuity and refraction are shown in table-4 thorough preoperative and postoperative. Postoperative IOL alignment methods are shown in table-5, the mean±SD of the slit-lamp target was 2.55±2.76 and in the range, of 0.0 to 12.0, the mean±SD of the corneal analyzer target was 2.55±1.98 and range was 0.0 to 11.0, and the mean±SD of the slit-lamp corneal analyzer was 3.27±2.98 and range was 0.0 to 16.0.Conclusions:We studied 2 methods of assessing toric IOL alignment postoperatively and found no significant difference between them. Both were reliable and predictable. In addition, we found that the simple preoperative marking technique we used yielded toric IOL alignment that was as accurate as that obtained with other commonly used techniques and that was within a clinically acceptable level.
ABSTRACT
Aims: Image-guided systems are the gold standard for determining toric intraocular lens (IOL) axis alignment. However, their high cost prevents widespread use of these systems. As an alternative, a simpler and affordable method could be performed manually using a slit-lamp biomicroscope. This study aims to compare the accuracy of manual toric IOL axis marking using a slit-lamp compared to the CALLISTO eye image-guided system.Study Design: Prospective comparativeMethods: In this prospective study, toric IOL axis alignment of 42 eyes with cataract and coexisting corneal astigmatism were evaluated using manual slitlamp method and CALLISTO eye image-guided method. Preoperative and postoperative uncorrected visual acuity, best corrected visual acuity, amount of spherical and astigmatic refractive errors, and postoperative IOL axis alignment were evaluated. Intraclass correlation of the manual method was calculated and the difference of IOL axis alignment to the image-guided method was compared.Results: Toric IOL implantation reduced the amount of astigmatic refractive error from -1.63 � 0.65 D to -0.50 � 0.19 D in the image-guided group and from -1.93 � -0.90 D to -0.87 � 0.26 D in the manual slitlamp group. As many as 90.5% of eyes in the image-guided group and 81.0% of eyes in the manual slitlamp group reached the target induced astigmatism (p=0.38). Manual axis marking showed intraclass correlation of 99.3%. However, when the manual method was compared to the image-guided method a mean difference in axis alignment of 10.98o (95% confidence interval: 9.32o - 12.63o) was observed.Conclusions: Alignment of toric IOL axis using the manual method demonstrated a consistent result; yet producing a considerable difference to the result of the image-guided method.
ABSTRACT
Correcting astigmatism safely and effectively has become a crucial part of modern cataract surgery due to the transformation of the surgery into a refractive procedure. The increased predictability and enhanced safety of Toric intraocular lens(IOL)implantation has made it the preferred method of correcting corneal regular astigmatism above 0.75D in cataract surgery. Toric IOL needs to be implanted in a precise axis position to achieve good astigmatism correction. A major cause of toric misalignment is postoperative rotation, which typically occurs soon after surgery. However, large axis misalignment will eliminate the astigmatism corrective effect of Toric IOL, even cause astigmatism in a new axis position. The factors responsible for IOL postoperative rotation are diverse. As a result, profound understanding of the factors is crucial for clinicians to minimize the rotation. Repositioning procedure is generally selected in case of significant rotation and the timing of the procedure is vital. This paper reviewed the influencing factors of IOL rotation postoperatively and its principle of treatment.
ABSTRACT
@#AIM:To compare the accuracy of Toric intraocular lens(IOL)alignment using the Verion image guided system and conventional manual marker. <p>METHODS:Prospective randomized controlled study. A total of 56 eyes of 47 age-related cataract patients who underwent phacoemulsification combined with Toric IOL implantation in our hospital from June 2016 to December 2019 were randomly divided into two groups:In the image-guided group, Verion navigation system collected anterior segmental images before surgery, and Toric target was set to 27 eyes in axial direction. In the marker group, Toric target was marked at 0° and 180° levels before surgery, and Toric target was marked in 29 eyes in axial direction according to the labeling ring. At 1h, 1wk, 1 and 3mo postoperatively, the anterior segment of patients with dilated pupil was photographed. Photoshop software was used to analyze the deviation between the actual axial direction and the target axial direction of the two groups, and the patients' naked eye visual acuity(UCDVA), best corrected visual acuity(BCDVA)and residual astigmatism were recorded. <p>RESULTS: At 1h and 3mo postoperatively, the deviation between the actual axis and the target axis of IOL in the navigation group was less than that in the marker group(1.5°±1.8° <i>vs</i> 3.1°±2.1°; 1.9°±1.6° <i>vs</i> 3.3°±2.4°, all <i>P</i><0.05). There was no difference in UCDVA(LogMAR)between the navigation group and the marker group(0.04±0.08 <i>vs</i> 0.06±0.07, <i>P</i>=0.338)and there was no difference in residual divergence(-0.39±0.32 <i>vs</i> -0.45±0.31D, <i>P</i>=0.491)between two groups at 3mo after operation.<p>CONCLUSION:Verion digital marking and manual marking showed high accuracy in marking Toric IOL axial direction. Although the navigation group showed no advantage in UCDVA and residual astigmatism, the IOL misalignment in navigation group was significantly smaller than the marker group, and Toric IOL axial direction was implanted more accurately under Verion digital marking.
ABSTRACT
@#AIM:To investigate the function of Pentacam in accurately selecting the model and axial position of Toric artificial lens. <p>METHODS: Totally 53 eyes of 46 cataract patients who were scheduled to receive phacoemulsification from January 2018 to December 2018 were selected in our hospital. Before the operation, corneal astigmatism was greater than 1.0D according to the examination results by AL-Scan and automatic corneal curvature instrument, and Pentacam was used to evaluate the corneal astigmatism to guide the accurate selection of Toric IOL model and the axial position to be implanted. Surgery was done by the same doctor. After operation, the patients were traced and visited for 3mo to collect the uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA), the best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), the whole-eye astigmatism, the corneal curvature and target induced astigmatism(TIA)before and after the operation as well as the postoperative astigmatism, the rate not relying on the glasses, visual quality assessment and so on. <p>RESULTS: There was no obvious change on patients' corneal astigmatism before and after the operation. The whole-eye astigmatism was reduced and UCVA and BCVA were obviously improved. The difference was statistically meaningful(<i>P</i><0.05). The postoperative residual astigmatism and TIA were statistically tested, and the results showed no statistical significance(<i>P</i>>0.05). The rate of distant vision defecation and visual quality were significantly improved. <p>CONCLUSION: Pentacam can evaluate the corneal astigmatism more comprehensively and accurately, which is helpful to guide the accurate selection of Toric artificial lens model, and to improve the postoperative expected effect.
ABSTRACT
@#With the development of refractive cataract surgery,Toric intraocular lens(Toric IOL)has been widely used in the treatment of cataract patients with regular astigmatism. And the rotational stability of Toric IOL has been paid more and more attention. This article reviewed the evaluation method of the rotation stability, and analyzed various related influencing factors.
ABSTRACT
@#AIM: To compare the clinical effects of two brands of Toric intraocular lens(IOL)used in surgical correction of cataract with corneal astigmatism.<p>METHODS: Totally 35 patients(50 eyes)with corneal astigmatism who underwent ophthalmic surgery from April 2019 to July 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 25 eyes of 20 patients were implanted with Rayner 623T, while 25 eyes of 15 patients with Alcon AcrySof Toric IOL. Three months after surgery, the uncorrected distance visual acuity(UCDVA), best corrected distance visual acuity(BCDVA), residual astigmatism, rotational degree of intraocular lens, contrast sensitivity, objective visual quality and the National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire(NEI VFQ-25)scale score were compared. Vector analysis was performed using the Alpins method.<p>RESULTS: The mean postoperative UCDVA(LogMAR)and BCDVA(LogMAR)in the Rayner group were 0.17±0.20 and 0.08±0.15, respectively(<i>P</i>>0.05), while those in the Alcon group were 0.21±0.16 and 0.10±0.11, respectively(<i>P</i>>0.05). The mean residual astigmatism in the Rayner group was(-0.57±0.24)D while that in the Alcon group was(-0.50±0.28)D(<i>P</i>>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in IOL rotational stability, vector analysis parameters, contrast sensitivity and objective visual quality(<i>P</i>>0.05). The NEI VFQ-25 scale score was 85.16±5.91 in the Rayner group while it was 82.08±6.16 in the Alcon group(<i>P</i>>0.05).<p>CONCLUSION: The two brands of Toric IOL-Rayner 623T and Alcon AcrySof Toric showed no significant difference in their clinical outcomes.
ABSTRACT
@#AIM: To observe the clinical effect of Toric intraocular lens(Toric IOL)implantation in the correction of corneal astigmatism, and vector analysis of residual astigmatism and corneal astigmatism.<p>METHODS: A retrospective case observation study. A total of 63 patients with 77 eyes who underwent phacoemulsification combined with Toric IOL implantation in our hospital from September 2018 to October 2019 were selected. LogMAR uncorrected distance visual acuity(UCDVA), best corrected distance visual acuity(BCDVA), residual astigmatism of subjective refraction were observed after operation in 1wk, 1mo, and 3mo. And after dilated pupil, the Toric IOL axis position was measured by OPD-scanⅢ, and compared with the target axis position(LAD).<p>RESULTS: The median(interquartile range)of UCDVA at 1wk, 1mo, and 3mo after operation were 0.22(0.15, 0.40), 0.30(0.15,0.40),and 0.30(0.15, 0.40), which were better than those of UCDVA \〖0.82(0.60, 1.22)\〗 and BCDVA \〖0.52(0.30, 0.70)\〗 before operation(<i>P</i><0.008). The residual astigmatism was 0.75(0.50, 1.00), 0.75(0.38, 1.00), 0.50(0.25, 1.00)D, respectively, which was significantly lower than that of preoperative corneal astigmatism \〖2.19(1.73, 2.69)D\〗(<i>P</i><0.008). At 3mo after surgery, the proportion of UCDVA(LogMAR)≤0.301 was 69%; the proportion of residual astigmatism ≤0.75D was 73%. The median LAD at 1wk, 1mo, and 3mo after surgery were 2.0°, 2.0°, and 3.0°; 81%, 82%, 77% were less than 5°. The maximum LAD value is 11°. Astigmatism vector analysis: preoperative corneal astigmatism was 2.31±0.80D, centroid value was 1.44D@177°±1.99D; Predicted postoperative residual astigmatism was 0.14±0.17D, centroid value was 0.02D@58°±0.22D; residual astigmatism at 3mo after operation was 0.69±0.53D, centroid value was 0.05D@142°±0.88D.<p>CONCLUSION: Toric IOL can effectively correct corneal astigmatism in patients with cataract and has good rotational stability. Astigmatism vector analysis can directly show the difference between predicting postoperative astigmatism and actual residual astigmatism, which is helpful to analyze and optimize the measurement of corneal astigmatism, calculation of IOL degree, surgical design, postoperative observation.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of 4-haptic bitoric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in Asian patients with cataract and astigmatism. METHODS: A total of 19 eyes with ≤25.0 mm axial length and ≥0.75 diopters (D) corneal astigmatism were included in this prospective non-comparative study. All subjects underwent phacoemulsification with implantation of an AT Torbi 709M IOL. Visual and refractive outcomes as well as toric IOL axis were evaluated during a 3-month follow-up. Errors in predicted residual spherical equivalent were calculated by subtracting predicted residual spherical equivalent from postoperative refraction. RESULTS: Uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity improved significantly 3 months after surgery, from 0.43 to 0.05 and from 0.24 to −0.05, respectively. Mean refractive cylinders also decreased significantly, from −1.91 preoperatively to −0.54 D 3 months after surgery. Mean J0 and J45 decreased 3 months postoperatively, from 0.26 to 0.03 D and from 0.24 to −0.06 D, respectively. After 3 months, mean absolute IOL rotation was 1.81°. Errors in predicted residual spherical equivalent showed a hyperopic shift of 0.35 D. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of 4-haptic bitoric IOL proved to be effective for correcting astigmatism in Asian eyes during cataract surgery.
Subject(s)
Humans , Asian People , Astigmatism , Cataract , Follow-Up Studies , Lens Implantation, Intraocular , Lenses, Intraocular , Phacoemulsification , Prospective Studies , Visual AcuityABSTRACT
Objective To analysis the distribution of posterior corneal astigmatism (PA) and evaluate the influence of keratometric astigmatism (KA) and total corneal astigmatism (TCA) on the calculation of Toric intraocular lens (Toric IOL) in patients with age-related cataract (ARC) and high corneal astigmatism.Methods An observational study design was adopted.Pentacam was used to measure 200 eyes of 181 patients with ARC and KA＞0.75 D in Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University from August 2016 to April 2017.KA,PA,TCA and anterior corneal astigmatism (AA) were recorded.The astigmatism magnitude and axis of PA was studied.The subjects were divided into astigmatism with the rule group,astigmatism against the rule group and oblique astigmatism group according to the axis of AA.The correlations of decomposition values between PA and AA or KA and TCA in each group were analyzed by Pearson linear correlation analysis.The difference of decomposition values between KA and TCA in each group was compared by paired sample t test.The type and axis of Toric IOL were calculated by online formula according to KA and TCA.This study followed the Declaration of Helsinki and written informed consent was obtained from each patient prior to any medical examination.Results The mean astigmatic magnitudes of PA was -0.32 D×93.1°.PA exceeded 0.5 D in 22 eyes (11％).The steepest posterior corneal meridian was vertically aligned in 163 eyes (81.5％).The decomposition value KP(0) and KP (45) of PA were positively correlated with those ofAA (r=0.480,P＜0.001;r=0.251,P＜0.001).The mean astigmatic magnitudes of KA and TCA were 1.44D×89.6° and 1.32 D×89.5° in astigmatism with the rule group,1.39 D×153.4° and 1.71 D×154.4° in astigmatism against the rule group and 1.13 D× 122.0° and 1.24 D× 124.2° in oblique astigmatism group.53 eyes (69.7％) had KA higher than TCA in astigmatism with the rule group.82 eyes (87.3％) had KA lower than TCA in astigmatism against the rule group;20 eyes (66.7％) had KA lower than TCA in oblique astigmatism group.There were significant differences in KP (0) between KA and TCA in different astigmatism groups (all at P＜0.001).The calculated Toric IOL type were inconsistent in 85 eyes(42.5％) and the calculated axis were inconsistent in 176 eye s (88.2％).Conclusions In patients with high corneal astigmatism,the astigmatism type of PA is mostly astigmatism against the rule.Ignoring the PA can lead to deviation of Toric IOL type selection and axis placement in some patients.For patients who cannot measure PA or TCA,the type of Toric IOL should be adjusted appropriately.
ABSTRACT
@#AIM: To explore the Accuracy of OPD-Scan III labeling method in corneal astigmatism before Toric intraocular lens implantation(IOL).<p>METHODS: Totally 100 patients with cataract were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group according to the random number table, 50 cases each. The control group used a slit lamp horizontal narrow band labeling method. The observation group used the OPD-Scan III labeling method. The preoperative and postoperative corneal astigmatism and naked eye visual acuity were compared between the two groups. The axial dislocations of the two groups were measured at 1mo and 3mo after operation.<p>RESULTS: At 3mo after operation, corneal astigmatism(0.56±0.29、0.58±0.27D)decreased significantly in the two groups. The visual acuity of the naked eye was significantly higher than that before surgery. The corneal astigmatism(<i>t</i>=0.356, <i>P</i>=0.721)and the visual acuity of the naked eye were compared between the two groups(<i>t</i>=0.587,<i> P</i>=0.558). The IOL axial deviations were compared between the two groups at 1d and 3mo after surgery(<i>P</i>>0.05).<p>CONCLUSION: Before Toric IOL implantation, OPD-Scan III and slit lamp horizontal narrow band labeling method are equally accurate in labeling corneal astigmatism and without traumatic.
ABSTRACT
Correction of astigmatism is an important part of refractive cataract surgery.Currently,methods of combined corneal astigmatism correction in cataract surgery mainly include keratotomy and Toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.Whether it is a scalpel or femtosecond laser keratotomy,the effects of astigmatism correction is related to the position,shape,length and depth of the incisions,configuration,and distance between incisions and optic axis.Moreover,the pattern and material of Toric IOL can affect its rotation stability and effects of astigmatism correction.This article reviewed recent progress of correcting corneal astigmatism in cataract surgery,which provided reference for ophthalmologists in clinical.
ABSTRACT
We describe a surgical technique for the correction of isolated congenital lenticular coloboma associated with high corneal astigmatism. Transscleral fixation of the capsular bag with a single eyelet Cionni capsular tension ring was followed by in-the-bag implantation of a toric intraocular lens (IOL). This lead to complete correction of the lenticular defect and perfect alignment of the toric lens. In this case, the child attained an unaided distance visual acuity of 20/30 following amblyopia therapy and a well-aligned toric IOL at 12 months of follow-up. This technique can be used in cases with concomitant lenticular coloboma and significant corneal astigmatism.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To evaluate the rotational stability of toric intraocular lens (IOL) when co-implanted with a capsular tension ring (CTR) as compared to that of a toric IOL without a CTR. Methods: This was a prospective randomized clinical trial performed in a tertiary care centre in India. Fifty adult human eyes with visually significant cataract and regular corneal astigmatism ?1.5D divided into two groups of 25 eyes each, A and B by simple randomization. Eyes with corneal pathology, lens subluxation, and a specular endothelial cell count <2000/mm2 were excluded from the study. The eyes in both the groups underwent standard phacoemulsification and were implanted with a toric IOL. In Group A, a CTR was put in the bag before IOL implantation. The groups were called for follow-up on day 1, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months, postoperatively. The axis of the toric IOL on each visit was measured by slit lamp imaging in retroillumination and analyzed digitally. Results: Mean rotation of toric IOL at 3 months postoperatively was 1.85 ± 1.72° in Group A and 4.02 ± 2.04° in Group B. The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.003). Conclusion: Coimplantation of a CTR is a safe and effective technique for ensuring better rotational stability of toric IOLs
ABSTRACT
Corneal astigmatism includes anterior astigmatism (AA) and posterior astigmatism (PA).According to the hterature,85.0％-96.1％ PA ranging from-0.01 to-1.10 D refers to astigmatism against the rule.With the age increasing,PA shows a significant trend from astigmatism against the rule to with the rule,while AA shows toward against-the-rule astigmatism.Therefore,PA often leads to partially decrease of total astigmatism (TA) in young adults,but the increase of TA in aged elderly.Clinically,ignorance of PA will lead to a false estimate of TA,thereby affecting visual quality after refractive cataract surgery.And this article aims to introduce the measurement of PA and its clinical significance for providing the reference in clinical practices.
ABSTRACT
Objectivc To compare the accuracy and practicability of OPD-Scan Ⅲ marker methods and slit light narrow band marker methods in phacoemulsification and Toric IOL implantation.Methods A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted in 70 eyes of 70 patients with regular astigmatism (1.00-3.00 D).All patients underwent phacoemulsification and Toric IOL implantation and were randomly divided into two groups according to preoperative marker methods:observant group,in which OPD-Scan Ⅲ marker methods were used in 35 eyes of 35 patients,and control group,with application of slit light narrow band marker methods in 35 eyes of 35 patients.The postoperative visual acuity,residual astigmatism and deviation of lens axis (LAD) were observed and compared between the two groups.Results The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) between preoperative data and 3 months after surgery was statistically significant [(0.11 ± 0.09) vs.(0.59 ± 0.25)] (P =0.000).The difference in the postoperative 1 day and 3 months LAD was no statistically significant (P ＞ 0.05).The astigmatism between preoperation and 3 months after treatment was significant [(1.88 ± 0.49) D vs.(0.54 ± 0.30) D] (P =0.000).There was no significant difference in LAD between the two groups neither the first day nor 3 months after operation (both P =0.621).Conclusion OPD-Scan Ⅲ marker methods and slit light narrow band marker methods are both highly accurate and practical,but the former requires less for operator and is more easily accepted by patients.